Categories
The Uncultured Saints

Ep. 9: A Philosfical Approach to the Lord’s Supper

We sinners have a way of taking good things from God and messing them up, including the Lord’s Supper. God has given us specific words to describe what’s it is and what’s going on. But those words don’t make sense, they’re not reasonable. So we have to try and figure out what Jesus really means, because He obviously can’t mean what He’s saying. We take God’s gift, take it apart and try to put it back together again in ways that make sense to us. But God’s Words don’t describe reality like our words do. They actually create reality which we receive by faith.

 

Return to The Uncultured Saints

Categories
As Lutheran As It Gets

71: Philip Melanchthon – The Power of the Gospel, part 3: Justification and Faith

Pastors Gillespie and Riley continue their discussion with Philip Melancthon on the power of the Gospel from his Loci Communes. This week, what is righteousness?

Text: Commonplaces: Loci Communes 1521 by Philip Melanchthon, p. 86

Show Notes:

Questions? Comments? Show Ideas? Send them to us at http://higherthings.org/contact.

Please rate and review the show in Apple Podcasts, via https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/as-lutheran-as-it-gets/id1288159643?mt=2.

And as always, don’t forget Pr. Gillespie’s coffee for your caffeinated needs.

Support the work of Higher Things®

Categories
Articles

Concord #8: Augsburg Confession (Obedience)

Article 6: New Obedience

“Faith apart from works is dead,” writes St. James (James 2:26b ESV). But we confess that we are saved by faith alone, apart from works. Doesn’t the addition of works cancel faith? Or maybe Lutherans have gotten it wrong, and obedience really is a part of faith and salvation.

It would be a mistake to say that Lutherans never talk about good works or obedience to God. But good works must have their proper place. The 6th article of the Augsburg Confession speaks to good works: “Also they teach that this faith is bound to bring forth good fruits, and that it is necessary to do good works commanded by God, because of God’s will, but that we should not rely on those works to merit justification before God,” (Augsburg Confession VI.1).

First, good works follow faith; they don’t precede faith. Not a single good deed is required to obtain faith. Faith is obtained by the work of the Holy Spirit in the means of grace. But, faith is bound to bring forth good fruits of obedience. Read that again. Faith is bound to bring forth good fruits.

Second, this means that faith isn’t just a potential to do good works, as if it’s a special divine power that you can decide to use or not use. Faith is bound to bring forth good fruits. Why? Because faith is the work of the Holy Spirit. And the Spirit doesn’t stop with faith. He also works the good works in you. As St. Paul writes in Ephesians: “For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them,” (Ephesians 2:8-10). Who prepares the works? God does; we simply walk in them in obedience.

When you see good works and the new obedience worked by the Spirit in this way, we can then boldly confess along with the Augsburg Confession, “For remission of sins and justification is apprehended by faith, as also the voice of Christ attests: When ye shall have done all these things, say: We are unprofitable servants. Luke 17:10. The same is also taught by the Fathers. For Ambrose says: It is ordained of God that he who believes in Christ is saved, freely receiving remission of sins, without works, by faith alone,” (Augsburg Confession VI. 2-3).

You can read the Book of Concord at http://www.bookofconcord.org

 

“Concord” is a weekly study of the Lutheran Confessions, where we will take up a topic from the Book of Concord and reflect on what we believe, teach, and confess in the Lutheran Church. The purpose of this series is to deepen readers’ knowledge and appreciation for the confessions of the Lutheran Church, and to unite them “with one heart” to confess the teachings of Holy Scripture.

Rev. Jacob Ehrhard serves as pastor of Trinity Lutheran Church in New Haven, MO.

Categories
Higher History

Concord #6: Augsburg Confession (Justification)

Article 4: Justification

Original sin has replaced our original righteousness. That is to say, in the beginning God created man and woman in a right relationship with Him and all of creation, properly oriented toward God in knowledge and worship, and toward creation in vocation. But sin disordered that relationship. We became disoriented, crooked, skewed. Now our orientation is every which way but toward God.

Justification is getting lined back up again, like this paragraph is “left justified” because the words are lined up straight on the left side. Justification is how we get pointed back toward God; it’s how we get restored to that right relationship with Him that we lost. And being right with God, we also become right with the world.

No strength, merit, or work of our own can do this. It might get you close—really close, in fact. But if it’s not right in line, even minor imperfections will be amplified when it comes to reaching God. Like traveling to the moon—if you’re off even by fractions of a percent, you’ll sail right past into the outer darkness.

So how do we get right?  Lutheran churches teach that people “cannot be justified before God by their own strength, merits, or works, but are freely justified for Christ’s sake, through faith, when they believe that they are received into favor, and that their sins are forgiven for Christ’s sake, who, by His death, has made satisfaction for our sins. This faith God imputes for righteousness in His sight. Rom. 3 and 4” (Augsburg Confession, article IV). Faith. Faith is what justifies.

But it’s not just any old faith. It’s faith that we are justified for Christ’s sake. He’s the One who does the work with His sacrificial death and victorious resurrection. We don’t justify ourselves by approaching God; God justifies us by receiving us into favor. And He does so by forgiving our sins.

This faith He imputes for righteousness. That means that He counts it for righteousness. It’s like you log into your bank account to find that someone has deposited more money than you could ever hope to spend. Through faith, God gives us credit for Jesus’ work. And we are justified.

You can read the Book of Concord at http://www.bookofconcord.org

 

“Concord” is a weekly study of the Lutheran Confessions, where we will take up a topic from the Book of Concord and reflect on what we believe, teach, and confess in the Lutheran Church. The purpose of this series is to deepen readers’ knowledge and appreciation for the confessions of the Lutheran Church, and to unite them “with one heart” to confess the teachings of Holy Scripture.

Rev. Jacob Ehrhard serves as pastor of Trinity Lutheran Church in New Haven, MO.

Categories
HT Video Shorts

Jesus believes for me OR Lord, I believe help now my unbelief – HT Video Short

► Subscribe to our channel to get notifications when we go live: https://dtbl.org/youtube || If you have questions or topics that you’d like discussed on HTV, email them to support@higherthings.org or send text to 936-647-3235.

Categories
Higher History

Concord #24: Augsburg Confession (Good Works pt. 5)

Article 20: Good Works (part 5)

Furthermore, it is taught on our part that it is necessary to do good works, not that we should trust to merit grace by them, but because it is the will of God. It is only by faith that forgiveness of sins is apprehended, and that, for nothing. And because through faith the Holy Ghost is received, hearts are renewed and endowed with new affections, so as to be able to bring forth good works. For Ambrose says: Faith is the mother of a good will and right doing. For man’s powers without the Holy Ghost are full of ungodly affections, and are too weak to do works which are good in God’s sight. Besides, they are in the power of the devil who impels men to diverse sins, to ungodly opinions, to open crimes. This we may see in the philosophers, who, although they endeavored to live an honest life could not succeed, but were defiled with many open crimes. Such is the feebleness of man when he is without faith and without the Holy Ghost, and governs himself only by human strength. (Augsburg Confession XX.28-34).

It is necessary to do good works because that is God’s will. But good works cannot be done without faith. Faith receives the forgiveness of sins, which renews the sinner and causes him or her to desire to do what God desires. But without faith, there can be no good works. This means that a good work is not measured by its outward quality, but rather by the faith of the individual who does it. Ambrose (a church father from the 4th century) says it well: “Faith is the mother of a good will and a right doing.” In a sense, then, forgiveness is the grandmother of good works. The Word of forgiveness gives birth to faith, and faith gives birth to good works.

It is certainly possible to do a work that is outwardly good without faith. Philosophers have been concerned with right living since the early Greeks, but they never accounted for the severity of original sin.

 

How to do good works

So, in conclusion, the teaching of grace does not forbid works, but rather shows exactly how good works are done. Good works flow from faith.

Hence it may be readily seen that this doctrine is not to be charged with prohibiting good works, but rather the more to be commended, because it shows how we are enabled to do good works. For without faith human nature can in no wise do the works of the First or of the Second Commandment. Without faith it does not call upon God, nor expect anything from God, nor bear the cross, but seeks, and trusts in, man’s help. And thus, when there is no faith and trust in God all manner of lusts and human devices rule in the heart. Wherefore Christ said, John 15:5: Without Me ye can do nothing; and the Church sings:

Lacking Thy divine favor,
There is nothing found in man,
Naught in him is harmless. (Augsburg Confession XX.35-40)

You can read the Book of Concord at http://www.bookofconcord.org

 

“Concord” is a weekly study of the Lutheran Confessions, where we will take up a topic from the Book of Concord and reflect on what we believe, teach, and confess in the Lutheran Church. The purpose of this series is to deepen readers’ knowledge and appreciation for the confessions of the Lutheran Church, and to unite them “with one heart” to confess the teachings of Holy Scripture.

Rev. Jacob Ehrhard is pastor of Trinity Lutheran Church in New Haven, MO.

Categories
Higher History

Who Was Martin Luther? Part 26

by Rev. Donavon Riley

After days of back and forth between Martin Luther and the papal representatives, Elector Frederick finally urged his now infamous professor to write an appeal to Rome, to “the pope badly informed to the pope better informed.” At the same time, Luther’s colleague Staupitz encouraged him to write a final summary of his position to Cardinal Cajetan. In both letters Luther summed up his position saying he could not recant any of his teachings because that would, in effect, be creating new articles of faith. The Wittenberger could not recant, he argued, because what he taught was biblical and thus the very Word of God which could not err.

Once the letters had been sent, Luther and Staupitz met in private to talk about what would happen next. Martin’s position was clear. He was in mortal danger. He would have to flee under cover of darkness if he wanted to save his life. To this end, Staupitz released Martin from his monastic vows. He was no longer bound to obey the rules of his order or his superiors. After this was done, Staupitz and Luther’s companions fled Augsburg. Now Luther was alone.

Luther, for his part, snuck out through a hole in the city wall, left his monk’s cowl behind, climbed up on an old nag, and made his way to Wittenberg undetected. Later, upon reflection, Martin said that when he arrived at the gates of the city and dismounted he could barely stand he was so exhausted, overcome as he was by feelings of fear and hope. Emotions that would hound him for many days and months afterwards.

Cardinal Cajetan, learning of Luther’s escape, wrote to Frederick, promising the Elector that Rome would not so easily forget what had happened in Augsburg and the Elector’s part in all of it. The matter would be prosecuted and the glory of Rome would not be allowed to suffer blemish. Frederick either sent Luther to Rome in chains or, at the least, he must publicly reject Martin’s teachings. Whatever the case, the Cardinal was clear; turn over Luther or suffer the full power of Rome crashing down on Wittenberg.

Next week, we will examine more of the attacks on Luther after Augsburg and their consequences.

Rev. Donavon Riley is the pastor of St. John’s Evangelical Lutheran Church in Webster, Minnesota.

Categories
Higher History

Who Was Martin Luther? Part 25

by Rev. Donavon Riley

While friends, colleagues, and supporters of Martin Luther worked to secure him safe passage to Augsburg, and the freedom to move about the city once there, he was visited by representatives of Cardinal Cajetan. They encouraged Luther to repent of his teaching, then everything would be forgiven and forgotten. Luther was even asked if his motives were less than serious, and whether he intended to turn the meeting into a sporting event.

Cajetan, for his part, took Luther’s teaching deadly serious. He had read numerous published works by Luther, and had written lengthy responses to the pillars of Luther’s teaching. This was no small thing, especially for Rome, since the cardinal was widely considered to be one of the greatest minds of his generation. That Cajetan criticizing the young German professor meant Luther’s theology was a threat to the church that was not to be taken lightly. He attacked Luther’s positions on whether a Christian can build up merits to earn his way into heaven, whether one had to have true faith to be justified and receive grace, and whether the Pope had the authority to grant indulgences.

Cajetan had been charged by his superiors in Rome not to debate with Luther, but to secure a one word answer from the monk: “I recant.” That is, Luther was to repent of his teaching and return to the papal fold. Ironically, the meeting between Cajetan and Luther happened in the Fuggar house, who was the primary banking family in Europe who money had been a large part of the Indulgence Controversy.

When they finally met, Cajetan said, “First, repent of your errors and recant them. Second, promise never to teach them again. Finally, do not again do anything to upset the peace of the church.” Luther asked, “which errors?” Cajetan answered Luther specifically and this was the mistake in judgement that undid the meeting altogether. Cajetan had been ordered not to debate Luther, but it seems the greatest theologian of his generation could not resist taking Luther’s bait.

The two men went back and forth at each other from across the table, even though the exchange was calm and cordial. By the end of the day the discussion had settled on the authority of the Pope. They agreed to come back the next day to continue their discussion. Cajetan demanded Luther acknowledge that the Pope had the God-given authority to issue indulgences. Martin asked if he could have time to think and formulate a written answer. The cardinal said, “I will be pleased to hear what you have to say…”

The third time, then, that Luther appeared before Cajetan, written response in hand, he was also shadowed on his left and right hand by two of Elector Fredrick’s lawyers. Cajetan read Luther’s lengthy answer to the question of papal authority. He read it, then said, “Now, it’s time for you to recant.” And that’s when a full-blown debate erupted between them so violent that by the end, Cajetan threatened to have Luther dragged away in chains to Rome and that he would excommunicate anyone who had anything to do with Luther. Finally, Cajetan yelled at Luther, “Get out, and don’t appear before me again unless you are ready to recant.”

After he had left the house Luther rejoiced and laughed at his good fortune. He said to his friends, Spalatin and Cajetan, that he had shattered Cajetan’s confidence. He concluded saying, “I will not become a heretic by denying the understanding through which I have been made a Christian.”

Next week we will examine how Luther’s debate with Cajetan and other events in Augsburg served to put Luther in even greater danger.

Rev. Donavon Riley is the pastor of St. John’s Evangelical Lutheran Church in Webster, Minnesota.

Categories
Higher History

Who Was Martin Luther? Part 24

by Rev. Donavon Riley

One of the significant teachings that led to Luther being summoned to Augsburg (to defend his teachings against charges of heresy) was his take on Christian righteousness. Late medieval theologians taught that a Christian, a true Christian, is one who has faith and is becoming better. Faith was formed by the love of God, and was formed continuously, refined and improved, by acts of love.

For late medieval theologians, a Christian’s righteousness was a process, a progressive sanctification, that happened through God’s infusion of grace. This grace was poured into a Christian specifically through the sacrifice of the Mass, confession, and penance. Special “spiritual works” also contributed to a Christian’s progress in sanctification and his overall growth in righteousness. In this way, the Papacy made itself indispensable to a Christian’s salvation. Apart from the Church, there could be no proper dispensation of grace and therefore no improvement in righteousness or progress in sanctification.

This brought Luther into direct confrontation with not just local church authorities, but with the entire papal system. During his lectures on the Psalm and then Romans he’d begun to see that the biblical teaching and the papal teaching on righteousness were at odds. This was a total revolution for Luther that carried him further and further away from the religion of his fathers.

Luther taught that a Christian is righteous and a sinner at the same time. A Christian is righteous on account of Jesus’ work for him, not because of his work for God. Thus, those who are faithful are always beginning again, daily, to live in Christ through faith. And as for works, and spiritual works in particular, they contribute nothing to a Christian’s righteousness before God. Instead, because a Christian knows he is righteous on account of Christ he is freed from worry about whether his works for the neighbor are pleasing to God. For Luther, the truly faithful do not live always by loving God, but a Christian lives by God always loving him.

This eventually led to Luther’s critique of religious authorities, because if a Christian is simultaneously righteous and sinful, every day, all day, until the moment of death, then the Church (specifically, the papacy) has no special charge from God to dispense grace or guide a Christian in works that improved and bettered faith. Instead, all religious authorities, even the Pope, Luther concluded, are set in positions of authority by Christ Jesus, and therefore it is Christ, not any person, who is the actual authority in the Church.

This teaching resulted in Luther being summoned to Augsburg. He had not only contradicted the teaching of the theologians of the church, but he’d taught that the Pope wasn’t the final and ultimate church authority. Only Christ Jesus can make that claim. So, it’s little surprise then that Luther caused so much rage and anxiety amongst family, friends, colleagues, students, and especially his opponents.

Next week, we will examine Luther in Augsburg and his conversations with Cajetan.

Rev. Donavon Riley is the pastor of St. John’s Evangelical Lutheran Church in Webster, Minnesota.

Categories
Higher History

Concord #12: Augsburg Confession (Repentance)

Article 12: Repentance

In one sense, a Christian can’t come to the Sacraments without repentance. That is to say, you must recognize your sins and be sorry for them in order for the Sacraments to have any benefit for you. But in another sense, you can’t truly repent until after you have gone to the Sacraments.

This is because repentance has two parts. The first part is what drives you to find the gifts given in water, word, bread, and wine. The second part is what those means of grace accomplish. “Of Repentance they teach that for those who have fallen after Baptism there is remission of sins whenever they are converted and that the Church ought to impart absolution to those thus returning to repentance. Now, repentance consists properly of these two parts: One is contrition, that is, terrors smiting the conscience through the knowledge of sin; the other is faith, which is born of the Gospel, or of absolution, and believes that for Christ’s sake, sins are forgiven, comforts the conscience, and delivers it from terrors,” (Augsburg Confession, XII.1-6).

The knowledge of sin comes through the Law, but repentance doesn’t stop there. If it does, you will only end up despising Christ or despairing of your condition. Repentance is brought to completion by the Gospel, which is found in the Absolution, and also in Baptism and the Supper, which are tangible ways that the forgiveness of sins is delivered to you.

Repentance isn’t a one and done deal. This article of faith specifically deals with what happens when you sin after you have been baptized. It’s possible—in fact it’s guaranteed—that you will fall again after Baptism. Repentance is returning to your Baptism in confession and receiving the forgiveness of sins, life, and salvation that is in the Sacrament. It’s the rhythm of the Christian life.

There is one additional part of repentance, though it’s more of a fruit of repentance than repentance properly speaking. “Then good works are bound to follow, which are the fruits of repentance,” (Augsburg Confession, XII.6). As fruits, good works are the result of repentance, never the cause. However, because the Spirit is also at work in completing repentance through the means of grace, these fruits are bound to follow.

You can read the Book of Concord at http://www.bookofconcord.org

 

“Concord” is a weekly study of the Lutheran Confessions, where we will take up a topic from the Book of Concord and reflect on what we believe, teach, and confess in the Lutheran Church. The purpose of this series is to deepen readers’ knowledge and appreciation for the confessions of the Lutheran Church, and to unite them “with one heart” to confess the teachings of Holy Scripture.

Rev. Jacob Ehrhard serves as pastor of Trinity Lutheran Church in New Haven, MO.